Regulated fees could hit quality,
autonomous colleges had told HC
Colleges’ grim, undecided on appeal
The Bombay high
court has ruled that the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational
Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fees) Act, enacted in 2015, also
applies to autonomous professional institutions.
In their
petition challenging its applicability to their fee structure, a bunch of
colleges had contended that if the law was applied to them, it would snatch
their financial autonomy and affect academic excellence.
The high court
rejected arguments that there was a conflict between the latest universities
Act and the 2015 law. “If parameters as provided under the 2015 law are to be
exercised by the autonomous colleges while determining their fees, they would
have much more freedom to charge fees in proportion with the services rendered
by them in their pursuit of academic excellence in contrast to the limited
scope that they have under Statute 613 (of the Universities Act). The only role
that the authority would play is to determine as to whether the fees so fixed
by the unaided private professional educational institutions, like the
petitioners, would amount to commercialization or profiteering or not,” said
the bench.
The fee
regulator, established under the 2015 Act, is headed by Justice M N Gilani, a
retired Bombay high court judge. Last year, the FRA had said it had
jurisdiction to regulate fees under the 2015 law and asked the autonomous
colleges to submit their fee structure for the 2017-2018 academic year.
The colleges,
including Somaiya, Welingkar and Sardar Patel, had approached the court
challenging the decision. Senior advocate Aspi Chinoy, counsel for Somaiya, had
contended that autonomy had been granted to them so that the colleges that have
potential for offering programmes of higher standards have complete freedom in
administrative, academic and financial matters. Senior advocate Shrihari Aney,
appearing for the state, pointed out that in the new Universities Act enacted
in 2016, “financial autonomy” had been taken away from the colleges; they were
allowed only academic and administrative autonomy.
The high court
said while the rules under the 1994 Universities Act provided that total fees
should not exceed the cost of education per student, the 2015 law had broader
parameters. The colleges could include factors like location, cost of land and
building, infrastructure, facilities and even additional expenditure, incurred
by them for achieving academic excellence, while fixing fees. Mumbai:
Autonomous institutes said they will honour the Bombay high court judgment, but
claimed that the Fee Regulating Authority (FRA)’s format of filling details
subtly aims to fix the fees and not just regulate it.
The FRA uses
software to decide the fee structure for colleges and courses based on their
income and expenditure. The main objective is to ensure there is no
profiteering and that colleges should have reasonable surplus.
An official
from one of the autonomous colleges that had moved court said they had hoped
for a ruling in their favour. “While the UGC wants us to excel in education and
give us freedom in several aspects, the state government’s policies are holding
us back. If they want us to give 7th Pay Commission prescribed salaries to
teachers, make students industry-ready, focus on high-quality research, there
should be some autonomy to decide the fees. All these need investments,” said
the official. The institutes are undecided about an appeal.
Another
official pointed out that though the HC said the FRA will only regulate the
fees and the colleges can fix their own fee structure, the process is not
conducive to colleges. “The software is designed in such a manner that it
almost looks like the authority wants to fix the fees. We will honour the HC
order. But it is not possible to provide a 360 degree approach in education if
autonomy is curbed,” said the official.
Source | Times of India| 27th January 2018
Regards!
Librarian
Rizvi Institute of
Management
No comments:
Post a Comment